Peer Review Process

The International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES & ARTS SGEM  have strong peer review process for all the submitted abstracts and manuscripts. There is a single or double blinded peer review (regarding the stage of the workflow process), to ensure an independent and transparent process between authors and reviewers.

Ready to be a Reviewer?

Would you be willing to act as a reviewer for abstracts and manuscripts, submitted to the SGEM Conferences on Social Sciences and Art?

Welcome to join!

We cordially invite you and your colleagues to participate in SGEM papers peer review process. Research scientists who are highly qualified in one or in more conference sections of the big scientific area – Social Sciences and Art and have proven scientific publication record, are welcome to join the Reviewer department of the SGEM Scientific and Program Committee.

 peer reviewers for sgem

The scope of the SGEM Conferences on Social Sciences & Art is full described with these 6 main sections: Modern Science; Ancient Science; Science and Society; Science and Humanities; Urban Planning; Architecture and Design; Science and Art (see all details here).

The Scientific and Program Committee select researchers, part of the Reviewers list, to be reviewers for every SGEM event. If you are selected, you will receive invitation from the Scientific and Program Committee for paper’s peer review process. Then  you will have an access to the Abstract & Manuscript Management System (AMMS).

A modern Abstract & Manuscript Management System (AMMS), will help each Reviewer to review and evaluate abstract and manuscripts in the easiest way in user-friendly environment. There will be a double blinded peer review - very important, in order to assure completely fair peer review process, without any conflict of interests.


The estimated criteria in the AMMS:
Within scope, Originality, Structure, Title, Abstract/Introduction, Methods, Figures and Tables, Results, Conclusion, Language.

The reviewer as well as the Scientific and Program Committee will decide:

  • If the author followed the paper’s guidelines?
  • If the chosen conference section is the right?
  • If the delegates, other lecturers and readers will find it interesting and useful?

Normally you would be expected to evaluate the paper according to the following:

  •  If the abstract is original or new?
  •  If the study design and methodology are appropriate and described so that others could replicate what is done?
  •  If the presented results are clearly and appropriately?
  •  If the conclusions are reliable and significant?
  •  If the work is of a high enough standard to be published in the Conference Proceedings and to be presented on the Conference?

The fair and timely review process done by the reviewers is the key factor for the selection of high-quality papers for presentation and publication. We greatly appreciate reviewers for their contribution to the success of the conference.

WHAT EXPERIENCE YOU WILL NEED TO PROVE?

degree certificateEducational qualification and degree in these fields – PhD and/or be Professor of accredited academic institution;

conference proceedings

Active researchers in the fields of Social Sciences and Arts;

english lang

Review experience in other Conference Proceedings or Journal in these fields;

profile information

At least two or more recent publications in peer-reviewed journals or proceedings;

What will be your responsibilities?

    •  To reviewing the abstract/manuscript objectively and to contribute to the decision-making process from the Scientific and Program Committee;
    •  To assist in improving the quality of the published papers, in a timely manner;
    •  To maintain the confidentiality of any information supplied by the editor or author. To make copy of the manuscript is forbidden;
    •  To alert the Scientific and Program Committee for any published or submitted content that is substantially like (or similar) with the reviewed paper;
    •  To be aware of any potential conflicts of interest (financial, institutional, collaborative or other relationships between the reviewer and author) and to alert the Committee.

What will be your benefits?

    • You will touch the high-level scientific papers in the fields of Social Sciences & Arts;
    • You will refresh your knowledge and gain experience in the fields of Social Sciences & Arts;
    • You will be involved in the peer review and decision-making process;
    • You will be part of SGEM Scientific Committee – section Reviewers;
    • You will receive a Certificate and will be included in the main Reviewers section of the SGEM WORLD SCIENCE (SWS) Society (https://sgemworld.at). You will setup your reputation;
    • You will earn points and will have special bonuses, if you want to publish papers in SGEM Proceedings and/or SWS Journal of fields of Social Sciences and Art(SSA).

What to do, if I want to apply for a Reviewer?

    • Copy of your educational qualification and degree – PhD etc. in these fields;
    • Proof for your review experience in other Conference Proceedings or Journal in these fields;
    • Certificates for excellent English, if you are not English native speaking;
    • Your recent photo (with proof) and your contact/address details.
    • Excellent English (verbal and written) language;
    • Wish to be part of the SGEM Scientific and Program Committee – section Reviewers.

If you think you could fulfill these requirements and you are interested in becoming a SGEM Proceedings reviewer, send us email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. with all the needed documents as attached files.
We are expecting you! Be part of the big scientific SWS Society of Social Sciences & Art.

If you are already a member of the big SGEM Conferences family, please write us the exact year, your published paper title and SGEM ID (preferably).

/** LightBox **/ /** END LightBox **/ /** SweetAlert **/ /** **/ /** SweetAlert2 **/ /** END SweetAlert2 **/